Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:22:43 -0700 schrieb Kay Schenk <[email protected]>:
> ok, your original post compared these two links... > > http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html vs. > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Development > > and while the programming.html probably does align quite well with the > Development page on the wiki, the main contributing page is kind of > portal to various types of "contribution" so I don't think they're > equivalent. No, actually I named a few more and additionally think all of them are better covered on the wiki (with the exception of "donations" which IHMO is a mostly a different topic that might deserve its own point on the frontpage). > And, more's to the point, I think this would be quite a signficant > communicaton structure change, and one that I don't really think we > should be making on this list. Of course not. But I think it is the right place to get the discussion started. > I think the CC should address this. Yes. > We've already kind of discussed a web site overhaul (well a little > given the Kenai delay) but I really don't think it's appropriate for > us to enter into this type of wholescale reorganization of how > information is to be presented. Why not? Reactions show the contributing-domain to be quite misleading ... > > but I am more concerned about the "generic contributing entrypoint" > > which does not clearly map to one project ... > > yes, and this is one of my points Of course, the wiki frontpage could also need some additional love to fit the new role. Im not saying it is perfect -- its just better than what we have now. BR, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
