Sounds just fine to me. A.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to getting 0.8.0 out soon. Id like to make a trivial update, if > possible. > > Right now, using private clouds can only be by image id. I'd like to skip > the hardcoding of ubuntu 10.04, if someone sets the property > whirr.template. > > Ex. > > whirr.template=osFamily=CENTOS > > This would directly defer to the jclouds TemplateBuilderSpec logic. If we > did this, it would be easy to support vcloud. VCloud does have is family > info in the API, just not version. > Ex. osFamily=UBUNTU can work on any base vCloud that has an image of it, > but osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=10.04 will not. > > I would also sign up to edit the doc page, and could do this today. Any > against? > > -A > On Aug 14, 2012 4:40 PM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So I'd like to cross off two more bugs (as well as bumping to jclouds > > beta.10 and Tom looking into the YARN config error in tests) and then cut > > an RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-604 and > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-612. I've spent today > beating > > those guys up, and now have 'em working properly such that I'm running > > tests with basically the same results (modulo a little weirdness in core, > > where jclouds.endpoint ends up not being used) on EC2, Rackspace (old > gen - > > next gen apparently isn't going to have reverse-resolvable IPs for at > least > > a while. blergh) and our internal Cloudstack setup. > > > > Once those are reviewed and committed and Tom has looked at the YARN > thing, > > I'd like to go ahead with the RC. Does anyone else have any immediate > > pressing things they'd like to get in? The idea here is to get 0.8.0 out > > ASAP, and be able to turn around 0.8.1 as fast as needed after that. > > Iteration, iteration, iteration. =) > > > > A. > > >
