+1
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: > I noticed that we have both 0.8.0 and 0.8.0-alpha.1 versions in JIRA. > Since 0.8.0 has stabilized well and most tests are passing now, I > think we should change all the 0.8.0-alpha.1 occurrences to 0.8.0 and > call the release 0.8.0. Does that sound reasonable? > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Actually, we generally want os64Bit=true but hey. =) I actually have a >> patch-in-progress with an option for 64 bit, so I'll defer that 'til we can >> do this instead. >> >> A. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Whoops os64Bit=false, I meant. >>> On Aug 15, 2012 8:29 AM, "Adrian Cole" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Yeah. I think this can help with yarn testing, too. Ex. >>> > osFamily=CENTOS,osFamily64Bit=false >>> > >>> > I'll work it up, now. >>> > On Aug 15, 2012 8:17 AM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Sounds just fine to me. >>> >> >>> >> A. >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > +1 to getting 0.8.0 out soon. Id like to make a trivial update, if >>> >> > possible. >>> >> > >>> >> > Right now, using private clouds can only be by image id. I'd like to >>> >> skip >>> >> > the hardcoding of ubuntu 10.04, if someone sets the property >>> >> > whirr.template. >>> >> > >>> >> > Ex. >>> >> > >>> >> > whirr.template=osFamily=CENTOS >>> >> > >>> >> > This would directly defer to the jclouds TemplateBuilderSpec logic. >>> If >>> >> we >>> >> > did this, it would be easy to support vcloud. VCloud does have is >>> >> family >>> >> > info in the API, just not version. >>> >> > Ex. osFamily=UBUNTU can work on any base vCloud that has an image of >>> it, >>> >> > but osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=10.04 will not. >>> >> > >>> >> > I would also sign up to edit the doc page, and could do this today. >>> Any >>> >> > against? >>> >> > >>> >> > -A >>> >> > On Aug 14, 2012 4:40 PM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > > So I'd like to cross off two more bugs (as well as bumping to >>> jclouds >>> >> > > beta.10 and Tom looking into the YARN config error in tests) and >>> then >>> >> cut >>> >> > > an RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-604 and >>> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-612. I've spent today >>> >> > beating >>> >> > > those guys up, and now have 'em working properly such that I'm >>> running >>> >> > > tests with basically the same results (modulo a little weirdness in >>> >> core, >>> >> > > where jclouds.endpoint ends up not being used) on EC2, Rackspace >>> (old >>> >> > gen - >>> >> > > next gen apparently isn't going to have reverse-resolvable IPs for >>> at >>> >> > least >>> >> > > a while. blergh) and our internal Cloudstack setup. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Once those are reviewed and committed and Tom has looked at the YARN >>> >> > thing, >>> >> > > I'd like to go ahead with the RC. Does anyone else have any >>> immediate >>> >> > > pressing things they'd like to get in? The idea here is to get 0.8.0 >>> >> out >>> >> > > ASAP, and be able to turn around 0.8.1 as fast as needed after that. >>> >> > > Iteration, iteration, iteration. =) >>> >> > > >>> >> > > A. >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>
