Yeah. I think this can help with yarn testing, too.  Ex.
osFamily=CENTOS,osFamily64Bit=false

I'll work it up, now.
On Aug 15, 2012 8:17 AM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds just fine to me.
>
> A.
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 to getting 0.8.0 out soon.  Id like to make a trivial update, if
> > possible.
> >
> > Right now, using private clouds can only be by image id.  I'd like to
> skip
> > the hardcoding of ubuntu 10.04, if someone sets the property
> > whirr.template.
> >
> > Ex.
> >
> > whirr.template=osFamily=CENTOS
> >
> > This would directly defer to the jclouds TemplateBuilderSpec logic.  If
> we
> > did this, it would be easy to support vcloud.  VCloud does have is family
> > info in the API, just not version.
> > Ex. osFamily=UBUNTU can work on any base vCloud that has an image of it,
> > but osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=10.04 will not.
> >
> > I would also sign up to edit the doc page, and could do this today.  Any
> > against?
> >
> > -A
> > On Aug 14, 2012 4:40 PM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > So I'd like to cross off two more bugs (as well as bumping to jclouds
> > > beta.10 and Tom looking into the YARN config error in tests) and then
> cut
> > > an RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-604 and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-612. I've spent today
> > beating
> > > those guys up, and now have 'em working properly such that I'm running
> > > tests with basically the same results (modulo a little weirdness in
> core,
> > > where jclouds.endpoint ends up not being used) on EC2, Rackspace (old
> > gen -
> > > next gen apparently isn't going to have reverse-resolvable IPs for at
> > least
> > > a while. blergh) and our internal Cloudstack setup.
> > >
> > > Once those are reviewed and committed and Tom has looked at the YARN
> > thing,
> > > I'd like to go ahead with the RC. Does anyone else have any immediate
> > > pressing things they'd like to get in? The idea here is to get 0.8.0
> out
> > > ASAP, and be able to turn around 0.8.1 as fast as needed after that.
> > > Iteration, iteration, iteration. =)
> > >
> > > A.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to