OK, fine, then make the 1.3.3 version the last 1.3 release! Why not? Java 5 was released more than three years ago and is somebody is still stuck to Java 1.4 he will also surely don't mind to stick to Wicket 1.3.3... Well, that's just my opinion, but I think that Java 5 users should become preferred...
Regrads, Bendis On Saturday 15 of March 2008 11:54:00 Johan Compagner wrote: > I am sorry but if you cant move to M1 for that then you just have to > be on 1.3, thats just it. You can do your own patches yes so the > things we patch on 1.3 you apply on 1.4-m1. > > Look if everybody just tells us release a generified 1.3 so 1.4 now > (within a few weeks) and you can drop 1.3 completely then. Then that > 1.4 is fine by me, so then 1.3.3 (release at +/- the same time as 1.4) > is then pretty much the last one (maybe only exceptional security bug > fixes only) > > Johan > > On 3/15/08, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It may be unlikely, but I foresee a potential problem with this. A lot > > of us are talking about moving our production apps to this release that > > includes generics. That means our bread and butter is dependent on it. > > What if we push out a 1.4-M1 that has generics (+ miscellaneous), then > > everyone starts working on other things, and in the meantime we discover > > a bug in M1 that effects us? We can't necessarily just drop in 1.4-M2, > > because there are likely to be API breaks. Do we all have to manage > > adding patches to the release (1.4-M1-plus-custom-patches)? > > > > That's one of the reasons many companies won't allow a milestone / beta > > release to be depended on in production. Can we think of another > > solution? Perhaps 1.4 goes out quick, and to ease the concern of > > supporting 1.3 / 1.4/ 1.5 concurrently, 1.4 only has limited support - > > for urgent / critical patches? Or someone from among us that really want > > generics would be willing to do the merges / etc associated with > > supporting it? > > > > I'm just throwing ideas out there - feel free to shoot me down with a > > much better idea. > > > > Jeremy Thomerson > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is the plan. > > > > > > x-m1 is 1.3 + generics (+ any bugs that could be solved in the mean > > > time). > > > > > > x-m2 is what we are planning now. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > On 3/14/08, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And if the wicket core developers do not want to have 1.3 + 1.4 + 2.0 > > > > in > > > > > > parallel: I believe that we old wicket 2.0 users could live with xM1 > > > > (=1.3+ Generics) > > > > > > That means: > > > > 1. Not need to support more than 2 branches/Versions > > > > 2. Very quick generics for wicket based upan a stable release > > > > 3. We old Wicket 2 users now can mitgrate to xM1, having new > > > > features > > > > > > and Generics > > > > > > > 4. We old Wicket 2 users have to suffer a few API changes until > > > > > > releasing x but I think we can live with this. > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: Martin Benda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 22:49 > > > > > > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > > > Betreff: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation > > > > > > > > ...and the answer is: We would like to see java5-only major release > > > > > > *ASAP* If you are going to add many new features in the next major > > > > release, > > > > > those poor "early 2.0 adopters" (like me and my co-workers) will have > > > to wait another 6-12 months... > > > > > > > +1 for 1.4 = 1.3 + java5 :-) > > > > > > > > Bendis > > > > > > > > Dne Friday 14 of March 2008 22:32:35 Igor Vaynberg napsal(a): > > > > > the question, sounds like, is not whether or not java5 will make > > > > > it into the next major release - that has always been a given, the > > > > > question is whether or not the next "major" release should simply > > > > > be 1.3+java5 stuff ONLY which would allow it to be released very > > > > > quickly... > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Martin Benda > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Wicket devs, > > > > > > > > > > > > we are in the same situation too :-) For more than a year we > > > > > > are stuck to the dead 2.0 branch and are still hopefully > > > > > > awaiting the new generified major release. Old 2.0 with a few > > > > > > patches works > > > > > > quite > > > > > > > > > fine but we won't probably survive waiting another year for the > > > > 1.4/2.0 > > > > > release... > > > > > > > > > So I'm totally +1 for adding only generics and other Java 1.5 > > > > > > features in the next major release... > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Bendis > > > > > > > > > > > > Dne Friday 14 of March 2008 22:14:56 Stefan Lindner napsal(a): > > > > > > > Dear Philip, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we are in the same situation. Just starting a new project, we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussed to write a generic wrapper for all the wicket classes > > > > > > > (Model, Component, etc.). We are waiting for a generic wicket > > > > > > wersion > now for a year. Having a genierfied wicket version > > > > > > (let's > > > > > > > > > call it > 1.4M1 or 2.0M1) wohlg make us sooo happ. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Migration to wicket 1.3 was impossible because of heavy > > > > > > > generic > > > > > > > > > > > > usage > all around our code. It's hard to imagine how to use > > > > > > wicket's model > without generics. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I totally agree with your opinion: "Quit punishing us 2.0 > > > > > > > early > > > > > > > > > > > > > > adopters already". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is still a pleasuere to use OLD wicket 2.0 and it still > > > > > > > works > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pretty stable. And I am sure it will be much more pleasure to > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > with a generified wicket 1.4/2.0 > > Stefan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Philip A. Chapman > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 > > > > > > 22:00 > > > > > > > > > > > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Planning Wicket Next > > > > > > > > > > > > Generation > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been waiting on generics since 2.0 was killed. As an > > > > > > > early > > > > > > > > > > > > > > adopter of 2.0, I've been struggling with a few projects that > > > > > > > > > > > > where > written against 2.0. So far, I've fought off the urge > > > > > > to convert to > 1.3 simply because it doesn't make sense to > > > > > > rewrite for 1.3, then > again for 1.4. Also, these projects > > > > > > make *heavy* use of generics and > it would be a terrible pain > > > > > > to re-write them without. I'd rather go > straight to the > > > > > > generics version. Quit punishing us 2.0 early adopters > > > > > > > already. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > > > > > > > > I definitely don't have any votes in this, but I have > > > > > > > > several > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > production apps running with Wicket, and use 1.5 / generics > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > all > > of them. Has there been any discussion of a faster > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > that > > ONLY includes generics? Last I remember, someone had > > > > > > the generics > > patch(es) basically done, and just needed to > > > > > > apply > > > > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > I would really like to see generics soon, but if they get > > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > with all the other features for 1.4, it would be 6-9 > > > > > > months (at > > least) before I could use them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeremy Thomerson > > > > > > > > -- sent from a wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > > > > > > > > > > > dev@wicket.apache.org > > Sent: 3/14/08 4:23 PM > > Subject: > > > > > > Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation > > > > Its not that > > > > > > revolutionairy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example if 1.4 was just 1.3+generics then if your > > > > > > > > project > > > > > > > > > > > > like > > vocus thats already on 1.5 it would be a drop in > > > > > > replacement. So api > > and 'feature' wise not much has happend > > > > > > then, only easy of > > development (for most not all are fans > > > > > > ;)) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/14/08, Martijn Dashorst > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 3/14/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> is the next release an evolution or revolution? :) i > > > > > > > >>> think > > > > > > > > > > > > first > >>> we need to make a list of all major things we want > > > > > > to go into it, > >>> and then decide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I think it counts as revolutionary: abandoning Java 1.4 is > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> revolutionary I think. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > 2 - are we going to timebox the milestones, or plan > > > > > > > >>> > on > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > features added? > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> personally i think we should come up with a list of all > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> features we want, throw them into a backlog, and timebox > > > > > > > >>> it. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> See the wishlist: > > > > > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-14-wish-list.html > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > 3 - how many milestones do we plan? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> id like 6. 1-4 dev, 5-6 stabalizaton. we were never able > > > > > > > >>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > get > >>> away with just one beta release before, most bugs are > > > > > > found after > >>> we put out the first beta...so i dont expect > > > > > > a lot of bugs to be > >>> found until the last dev milestone > > > > > > goes > > > > > > out. > > > > > > > > > > >> Fine with me. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > 4 - which features go into each milestone? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> what are the features? :) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> :D > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-14-wish-list.html > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Martijn > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > >> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > Wicket > >> 1.3.1 is released Get it now: > > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Martin Benda > > > > > > Technology Leader > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > > > > > Cleverlance - The Clever Enterprise Solutions The Winner of > > > > > > the Technology FAST 50 for Czech Republic www.cleverlance.com > > > > > > <http://www.cleverlance.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > European Business Center > > > > > > Dukelských hrdinů 34 > > > > > > 170 00 Praha 7 > > > > > > Czech Republic > > > > > > > > > > > > Phone: +420 266 177 166 > > > > > > Cell.: +420 774 470 824 > > > > > > Fax: +420 266 177 155 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Martin Benda > > > > Technology Leader > > > > __________________________________________ > > > > Cleverlance - The Clever Enterprise Solutions The Winner of the > > > > > > Technology FAST 50 for Czech Republic www.cleverlance.com < > > > http://www.cleverlance.com/> > > > > > > > European Business Center > > > > Dukelských hrdinů 34 > > > > 170 00 Praha 7 > > > > Czech Republic > > > > > > > > Phone: +420 266 177 166 > > > > Cell.: +420 774 470 824 > > > > Fax: +420 266 177 155 > > > > > > -- > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 -- Martin Benda Technology Leader __________________________________________ Cleverlance - The Clever Enterprise Solutions The Winner of the Technology FAST 50 for Czech Republic www.cleverlance.com <http://www.cleverlance.com/> European Business Center Dukelských hrdinů 34 170 00 Praha 7 Czech Republic Phone: +420 266 177 166 Cell.: +420 774 470 824 Fax: +420 266 177 155
