And if the wicket core developers do not want to have 1.3 + 1.4 + 2.0 in 
parallel: I believe that we old wicket 2.0 users could live with xM1 (=1.3 + 
Generics)

That means: 
1. Not need to support more than 2 branches/Versions
2. Very quick generics for wicket based upan a stable release
3. We old Wicket 2 users now can mitgrate to xM1, having new features and 
Generics
4. We old Wicket 2 users have to suffer a few API changes until releasing x but 
I think we can live with this.

Stefan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Benda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 22:49
An: dev@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation

...and the answer is: We would like to see java5-only major release *ASAP* If 
you are going to add many new features in the next major release, those poor 
"early 2.0 adopters" (like me and my co-workers) will have to wait another 6-12 
months...

+1 for 1.4 = 1.3 + java5 :-)

Bendis

Dne Friday 14 of March 2008 22:32:35 Igor Vaynberg napsal(a):
> the question, sounds like, is not whether or not java5 will make it 
> into the next major release - that has always been a given, the 
> question is whether or not the next "major" release should simply be
> 1.3+java5 stuff ONLY which would allow it to be released very 
> quickly...
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Martin Benda
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Wicket devs,
> >
> >  we are in the same situation too :-) For more than a year we are 
> > stuck to the dead 2.0 branch and are still hopefully awaiting the 
> > new generified major release. Old 2.0 with a few patches works quite 
> > fine but we won't probably survive waiting another year for the 1.4/2.0 
> > release...
> >
> >  So I'm totally +1 for adding only generics and other Java 1.5 
> > features in the next major release...
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Bendis
> >
> >  Dne Friday 14 of March 2008 22:14:56 Stefan Lindner napsal(a):
> > > Dear Philip,
> > >
> >  > we are in the same situation. Just starting a new project, we  > 
> > discussed to write a generic wrapper for all the wicket classes  > 
> > (Model, Component, etc.). We are waiting for a generic wicket 
> > wersion  > now for a year. Having a genierfied wicket version (let's 
> > call it  > 1.4M1 or 2.0M1) wohlg make us sooo happ.
> >  >
> >  > Migration to wicket 1.3 was impossible because of heavy generic 
> > usage  > all around our code. It's hard to imagine how to use 
> > wicket's model  > without generics.
> >  >
> >  > I totally agree with your opinion: "Quit punishing us 2.0 early  
> > > adopters already".
> >  >
> >  > It is still a pleasuere to use OLD wicket 2.0 and it still works  
> > > pretty stable. And I am sure it will be much more pleasure to work  
> > > with a generified wicket 1.4/2.0  >  > Stefan  >  > 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----  > Von: Philip A. Chapman 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 22:00  
> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org  > Betreff: Re: Planning Wicket Next 
> > Generation
> > >
> > > ++++++++++1
> > >
> >  > I've been waiting on generics since 2.0 was killed.  As an early  
> > > adopter of 2.0, I've been struggling with a few projects that 
> > where  > written against 2.0.  So far, I've fought off the urge to 
> > convert to  > 1.3 simply because it doesn't make sense to rewrite 
> > for 1.3, then  > again for 1.4. Also, these projects make *heavy* 
> > use of generics and  > it would be a terrible pain to re-write them 
> > without.  I'd rather go  > straight to the generics version. Quit 
> > punishing us 2.0 early adopters  > already.
> >  >
> >  > Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> >  > > I definitely don't have any votes in this, but I have several  
> > > > production apps running with Wicket, and use 1.5 / generics in 
> > all  > > of them.  Has there been any discussion of a faster release 
> > that  > > ONLY includes generics?  Last I remember, someone had the 
> > generics  > > patch(es) basically done, and just needed to apply them.
> >  > >
> >  > > I would really like to see generics soon, but if they get put 
> > in  > > with all the other features for 1.4, it would be 6-9 months 
> > (at  > > least) before I could use them.
> >  > >
> >  > > Jeremy Thomerson
> >  > > -- sent from a wireless device
> >  > >
> >  > > -----Original Message-----
> >  > > From: "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  > > To: 
> > dev@wicket.apache.org  > > Sent: 3/14/08 4:23 PM  > > Subject: Re: 
> > Planning Wicket Next Generation  > >  > > Its not that 
> > revolutionairy.
> >  > > For example if 1.4 was just 1.3+generics then if your project 
> > like  > > vocus thats already on 1.5 it would be a drop in 
> > replacement. So api  > > and 'feature' wise not much has happend 
> > then, only easy of  > > development (for most not all are fans ;))  
> > > >  > > On 3/14/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> >  > >> On 3/14/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > >>> is the next release an evolution or revolution? :) i think 
> > first  > >>> we need to make a list of all major things we want to 
> > go into it,  > >>> and then decide.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> I think it counts as revolutionary: abandoning Java 1.4 is  > 
> > >> revolutionary I think.
> >  > >>
> >  > >>>  >  2 - are we going to timebox the milestones, or plan on  > 
> > >>>  > features added?
> >  > >>>
> >  > >>> personally i think we should come up with a list of all the  
> > > >>> features we want, throw them into a backlog, and timebox it.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> See the wishlist:
> >  > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-14-wish-list.html
> >  > >>
> >  > >>>  >  3 - how many milestones do we plan?
> >  > >>>
> >  > >>> id like 6. 1-4 dev, 5-6 stabalizaton. we were never able to 
> > get  > >>> away with just one beta release before, most bugs are 
> > found after  > >>> we put out the first beta...so i dont expect a 
> > lot of bugs to be  > >>> found until  the last dev milestone goes out.
> >  > >>
> >  > >> Fine with me.
> >  > >>
> >  > >>>  >  4 - which features go into each milestone?
> >  > >>>
> >  > >>> what are the features? :)
> >  > >>>
> >  > >> :D
> >  > >>
> >  > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-14-wish-list.html
> >  > >>
> >  > >> Martijn
> >  > >>
> >  > >> --
> >  > >> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache 
> > Wicket  > >> 1.3.1 is released Get it now:
> >  > >> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
> >
> >  --
> >  Martin Benda
> >  Technology Leader
> >  __________________________________________
> >  Cleverlance - The Clever Enterprise Solutions  The Winner of the 
> > Technology FAST 50 for Czech Republic  www.cleverlance.com 
> > <http://www.cleverlance.com/>
> >
> >  European Business Center
> >  Dukelských hrdinů 34
> >  170 00 Praha 7
> >  Czech Republic
> >
> >  Phone: +420 266 177 166
> >  Cell.: +420 774 470 824
> >  Fax: +420 266 177 155



--
Martin Benda
Technology Leader
__________________________________________
Cleverlance - The Clever Enterprise Solutions The Winner of the Technology FAST 
50 for Czech Republic www.cleverlance.com <http://www.cleverlance.com/>

European Business Center
Dukelských hrdinů 34
170 00 Praha 7
Czech Republic

Phone: +420 266 177 166
Cell.: +420 774 470 824
Fax: +420 266 177 155

Reply via email to