it might be a problem. detaching is expensive as it traverses the
component hierarchy. if there is a way to avoid that we should look
for it.

-igor

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The patch that is attached to this issue fixes the unit test, and
> doesn't fail the other tests.
>
> Disadvantage: request pages will be detached twice.
>
> Not sure if that is a real problem.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst (JIRA)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     [ 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>>  ]
>>
>> Martijn Dashorst updated WICKET-2130:
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>>    Attachment: wicket-2130.tgz
>>
>> untar in jdk-1.4/wicket
>>
>> generates a testcase package in src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/wicket2130
>>
>> Run the tests to see it fail.
>>
>>
>>> Pages stored in Session.touchedPages aren't detached when part of 
>>> ModalWindow
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>                 Key: WICKET-2130
>>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2130
>>>             Project: Wicket
>>>          Issue Type: Bug
>>>          Components: wicket
>>>    Affects Versions: 1.3.5, 1.4-RC2
>>>            Reporter: Martijn Dashorst
>>>             Fix For: 1.3.6, 1.4-RC3
>>>
>>>         Attachments: wicket-2130.tgz
>>>
>>>
>>> Creating a ModalWindow with a Page causes the newly constructed page not to 
>>> be detached.
>>> The page is stored in Session.touchedPages, but that list isn't properly 
>>> processed at the end of the request for detaching.
>>> I'll try to create a testcase for this.
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>

Reply via email to