i believe he meant to roll another release from trunk and call it rc4 :) i think if we are going to do that we might as well call it rc3.
the idea is that if there are no problems with an rc release we promote that release to final, so it should be as bug free as possible. -igor On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > Martijn, > I'm sorry - not entirely sure I understand what you meant when you > were talking about rc4... > > Did you mean that we should rebuild rc3 from trunk so that it could > hopefully be the final? > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd suggest rolling rc4 from here. And promote that one to 1.4 final >> if no npe or other trouble appears. It is a *release* candidate so we >> should aim for bug free. >> >> Martijn >> >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> >> wrote: >>> Was it something that you feel is important enough to force a rebuild of >>> rc3? >>> >>> (my money is on no - since it was previously unreported for however >>> long it has been in trunk and based on the time it will take to >>> rebuild the release) >>> >>> -- >>> Jeremy Thomerson >>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Juergen Donnerstag >>> <juergen.donners...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> fixed >>>> >>>> Juergen >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >> >
