I agree. I'll plan on cutting the rc4 release as soon as possible. It won't likely be today - I've been battling the cable company with internet outages all day. Very unproductive day overall. <carrier lost....>
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote: > i think that wicket trunk has been production-ready for a really long > time without a release. i also think that the next rc build has a very > good chance of becoming wicket-1.4.0. > > i say we should build the rc now. it will take about a week to become > 1.4.0 if all goes well, at which point Ate should know for sure what > impact his changes will have. If his changes require a break to public > api we roll another rc, if they do not we release 1.4.0 and include > his changes in 1.4.1. > > my two cents > > -igor > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's up to everyone else. I could do it on Monday. Igor, Martijn, >> others - what do you think? >> >> -- >> Jeremy Thomerson >> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay - I'll work on building an rc4 soon. Possibly tonight. If not, >>>> then it will probably be Friday afternoon. >>>> >>>> If you have anything else that you want to get into 1.4 - commit it now :) >>> >>> I do have some important improvements for Portlet header contributions >>> support! >>> But, I haven't had enough time to fully test them yet and probably will need >>> a few more minor changes before I'll be ready to commit them. >>> >>> I've been too busy lately with getting Pluto and Jetspeed-2 ready for the >>> upcoming release that I regrettably didn't had time to pay much attention on >>> Wicket and this pending new rc build. >>> >>> I would be great if building the rc4 could wait maybe one more week or at >>> least until next Monday, but I'll understand if that is considered a little >>> too late. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ate >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yep (typing this at ~200mph). The idea is that rolling multiple rc3's >>>>> will make testing them difficult: which version is being tested? Maven >>>>> also doesn't like multiple non-snapshot releases with the same >>>>> version. Therefore just rolling rcX's is easier, and might get us to a >>>>> final release sooner? Version numbers are cheap. >>>>> >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> i believe he meant to roll another release from trunk and call it rc4 >>>>>> :) i think if we are going to do that we might as well call it rc3. >>>>>> >>>>>> the idea is that if there are no problems with an rc release we >>>>>> promote that release to final, so it should be as bug free as >>>>>> possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> -igor >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Martijn, >>>>>>> I'm sorry - not entirely sure I understand what you meant when you >>>>>>> were talking about rc4... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did you mean that we should rebuild rc3 from trunk so that it could >>>>>>> hopefully be the final? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd suggest rolling rc4 from here. And promote that one to 1.4 final >>>>>>>> if no npe or other trouble appears. It is a *release* candidate so we >>>>>>>> should aim for bug free. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Was it something that you feel is important enough to force a rebuild >>>>>>>>> of rc3? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (my money is on no - since it was previously unreported for however >>>>>>>>> long it has been in trunk and based on the time it will take to >>>>>>>>> rebuild the release) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Juergen Donnerstag >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> fixed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>>>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >>>>>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
