That's up to everyone else. I could do it on Monday. Igor, Martijn, others - what do you think?
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeremy Thomerson wrote: >> >> Okay - I'll work on building an rc4 soon. Possibly tonight. If not, >> then it will probably be Friday afternoon. >> >> If you have anything else that you want to get into 1.4 - commit it now :) > > I do have some important improvements for Portlet header contributions > support! > But, I haven't had enough time to fully test them yet and probably will need > a few more minor changes before I'll be ready to commit them. > > I've been too busy lately with getting Pluto and Jetspeed-2 ready for the > upcoming release that I regrettably didn't had time to pay much attention on > Wicket and this pending new rc build. > > I would be great if building the rc4 could wait maybe one more week or at > least until next Monday, but I'll understand if that is considered a little > too late. > > Regards, > > Ate > > >> >> -- >> Jeremy Thomerson >> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Martijn Dashorst >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yep (typing this at ~200mph). The idea is that rolling multiple rc3's >>> will make testing them difficult: which version is being tested? Maven >>> also doesn't like multiple non-snapshot releases with the same >>> version. Therefore just rolling rcX's is easier, and might get us to a >>> final release sooner? Version numbers are cheap. >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> i believe he meant to roll another release from trunk and call it rc4 >>>> :) i think if we are going to do that we might as well call it rc3. >>>> >>>> the idea is that if there are no problems with an rc release we >>>> promote that release to final, so it should be as bug free as >>>> possible. >>>> >>>> -igor >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Jeremy Thomerson >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Martijn, >>>>> I'm sorry - not entirely sure I understand what you meant when you >>>>> were talking about rc4... >>>>> >>>>> Did you mean that we should rebuild rc3 from trunk so that it could >>>>> hopefully be the final? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd suggest rolling rc4 from here. And promote that one to 1.4 final >>>>>> if no npe or other trouble appears. It is a *release* candidate so we >>>>>> should aim for bug free. >>>>>> >>>>>> Martijn >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Was it something that you feel is important enough to force a rebuild >>>>>>> of rc3? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (my money is on no - since it was previously unreported for however >>>>>>> long it has been in trunk and based on the time it will take to >>>>>>> rebuild the release) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Juergen Donnerstag >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fixed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >>>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released >>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>> >> > >
