1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason.
-Matej On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason. > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this >>> convention, is it time for a change? >>> >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. >>> >>> -igor >>> >> >
