Easier? How's that? I find it really annoying that when I'm looking for something and I have to know upfront whether it is an interface or a class. And when reading the code, what difference does it really make if it is interface or a class? By that logic we should start using hungarian notation. You could easily see what type the class member is...
-Matej On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Ryan Gravener <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 It's nice to know what is an interface by seeing the I. Also for > IDEs its easier to find the class I'm looking for. > > > Ryan Gravener > http://bit.ly/no_word_docs > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Matej Knopp <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Altuğ B. Altıntaş <[email protected]> wrote: >>> what about upgrading projects from 1.4 to 1.5 ? >>> It breaks compatibility >> There will be other breaks. This is not a minor update. Breaks >> compatibility is hardly a valid argument here. We will break >> compatibility one way or another. But we will also provide migration >> path. Replacing Model with ObjectModel and then IModel with Model in >> code (just an made up example) is hardly a task that would prevent >> anyone from migrating application to 1.5. >> >> -Matej >> >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> Not: i am not a *committer* but loves wicket :) >>> >>> 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <[email protected]> >>> >>>> 1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I >>>> wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason. >>>> >>>> -Matej >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > -1 >>>> > >>>> > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> +1 >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket >>>> >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this >>>> >>> convention, is it time for a change? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh >>>> >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -igor >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Altuğ. >>> >> >
