what about upgrading projects from 1.4 to 1.5 ? It breaks compatibility -1
Not: i am not a *committer* but loves wicket :) 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <matej.kn...@gmail.com> > 1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I > wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason. > > -Matej > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <ronald.tet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -1 > > > > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket > >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this > >>> convention, is it time for a change? > >>> > >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh > >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. > >>> > >>> -igor > >>> > >> > > > -- Altuğ.
