Unless you can think of a spectacularly better name, I think you should just keep IHeaderResponse.
Tetsuo On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag > <juergen.donners...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but >> IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a >> resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as >> Header or Footer > > Agreed. I just haven't thought of a great name for it. > IAmGoingToRenderYourStuffSomewhereResponse seemed a little unwieldy, > and it was the best I had at the time. :) > > Perhaps IResourceContributions (to replace IHeaderResponse) and > IResourceContributor (to replace IHeaderContributor) and > contributeResources (to replace renderHead of IHeaderContributor)? > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://wickettraining.com > Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org >
