Can you add demo of contribution to the footer in the new example application?
"Jeremy Thomerson" <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: >On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jeremy Thomerson ><jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag >> <juergen.donners...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but >>> IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to >a >>> resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as >>> Header or Footer >> >> Agreed. I just haven't thought of a great name for it. >> IAmGoingToRenderYourStuffSomewhereResponse seemed a little unwieldy, >> and it was the best I had at the time. :) >> >> Perhaps IResourceContributions (to replace IHeaderResponse) and >> IResourceContributor (to replace IHeaderContributor) and >> contributeResources (to replace renderHead of IHeaderContributor)? > >Anybody else have an opinion on this? Good ideas for names? Strong >feelings to "just leave it alone"? > >-- >Jeremy Thomerson >http://wickettraining.com >Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity.
