On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but >> IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a >> resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as >> Header or Footer > > Agreed. I just haven't thought of a great name for it. > IAmGoingToRenderYourStuffSomewhereResponse seemed a little unwieldy, > and it was the best I had at the time. :) > > Perhaps IResourceContributions (to replace IHeaderResponse) and > IResourceContributor (to replace IHeaderContributor) and > contributeResources (to replace renderHead of IHeaderContributor)?
Anybody else have an opinion on this? Good ideas for names? Strong feelings to "just leave it alone"? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org
