Without looking into code, but the change about the defaultValue make sense to me - I remember a discussion about the constructor and why it has been removed - maybe we should check the mailinglist / the PRs before re-adding it.
kind regards Tobias > Am 24.05.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > I'd like to apply the two following improvements: > > -add a setDefaultValue(String value) to not force users to create a model for > static values > -add constructor StrngResourceLocator(String resourceKey, IModel<?> model). > (Has it been removed on purpose?) > > What do you think?
