Well ok, looking forward to see the single doc PDF export. ;-)

+1 to move to asciidoctor (in a branch till it is finished)

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 26.05.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>:
> 
> I am +1 to move to ASCIIdoctor if:
> - the student finds the task interesting to work on
> - the build is as easy as now
> 
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Also, the asciidoctor project has great documentation coming with it
>>> (I haven't been able to find any documentation regarding the gdoc
>>> format).
>> 
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/6.x/guide/contributing.html
>> has a link to it:
>> 
>>   - The guide uses Grails GDoc to generate the final HTML/PDF so you
>>   should consult with its syntax <http://grails.org/WikiSyntax>.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Martijn
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Martijn Dashorst
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Asciidoctor has many build options, including a maven plugin [1].
>>>> 
>>>> The default styling of asciidoctor is much more pleasing to the eye.
>>>> The momentum for fixing issues and improving the output format is
>>>> great, I rather use living technology than dead technology, and
>>>> getting fixes for asciidoctor format on github is easy, as it is
>>>> supported out of the box in the editors on github.
>>>> 
>>>> Martijn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Tobias Soloschenko
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would also recommend to stay at gdoc. I also evaluated AsciiDoctor
>>> and there are a lot of formatting and exporting issues to be solved and
>>> currently (as Martin said already) the process is rather simple to update
>>> the documentation and it is well integrated in the build process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If there aren't any big issues with gdoc it would be wasted time to
>>> migrate it to ascii doc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 26.05.2015 um 14:18 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]
>>>> :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I remember an earlier discussion about this change.
>>>>>> Can you please list what are the benefits?
>>>>>> One thing I remember is that GDoc is deprecated and Grails community
>>> won't
>>>>>> develop it anymore.
>>>>>> But the current version seems to work pretty well (Grails 2.4). It is
>>> well
>>>>>> integrated with our Maven build too.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For Apache Isis Dan Haywood had to implement some extra Ruby scripts
>>> to
>>>>>> improve something. I don't quite follow his work on this, but such
>>> custom
>>>>>> Ruby scripts bother me a bit because I'm not sure how easy this will
>>> be
>>>>>> integrated with Maven and Apache CI servers.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At my company we have the option of hiring a temp during the summer
>>>>>>> holidays, and one of the things I'd like the temp to do is a
>>> migration
>>>>>>> of our user manual from GDoc format to ASCIIdoctor.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is of course, if you would be willing to accept such a format
>>>>>>> change, and if the temp is willing to perform the task.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This would probably be a search/replace of tags. I don't know how
>>> much
>>>>>>> work it would entail, but it is not trivial considering the size of
>>>>>>> the manual.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The temp could probably start soon, and I'd be mentoring this work
>>>>>>> (but you are welcome to mentor as well if you want)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to