Ant(hony),

I can't think of much to write here in response that I didn't already
write in my lengthy prior email. If you have content you'd like to
see, add it (if you are still a WS committer) or tee up a patch in a
JIRA.

--benson




On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with the sentiment of Sanjiva's message, the WS project
> wouldn't exist without all the work and projects from the past and i
> don't see it would hurt to remember and recognize that, i.e. pay
> homage too them rather than cleanse them from the website. The history
> page sounds good, and whats the harm in also everywhere the existing
> WS sub projects get mentioned to also mention the ones that have moved
> out or been retired.
>
>   ...ant
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:
>> <meta>
>> Can we please drop the tone of this discussion?  While there are certainly
>> some (maybe many) that believe ad-hominems, flaming, and grousing are "The
>> Apache Way", they don't fit well in my personal view of same.
>>
>> Sanjiva, I'm looking at you here.  I don't know if you had too much coffee
>> today or what, but please take it down a notch? :)
>> </meta>
>>
>> I don't think it's at all unreasonable for folks in the WS community to want
>> things clean and correct - after all, that's sort of the main thrust we've
>> been trying to execute on in the past few months with cleaning up the
>> projects, the PMC list, etc.  10 months is plenty long for a project to move
>> itself - most graduated incubator projects are out and set up as TLPs within
>> a month or two.  On the other hand, of course people are busy and website
>> work isn't as glamorous as new plugin APIs. :)  So let's please try to get
>> some actual cooperative work happening here and focus on what needs doing
>> rather than who's asking.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Glen
>>
>> On 10/25/2010 10:47 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     It's been 10 MONTHS!?!   I think that's been more than an adequate 
>>> amount of
>>>     time for the Axis project to actually finish their job of moving to a 
>>> TLP.
>>>     You cannot tell me that in 10 months of time, not one person was able 
>>> to copy
>>>     the content over (or update poms and do a site:deploy or whatever you 
>>> guys do
>>>     for web content).
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that ws.apache.org <http://ws.apache.org> does not say a WORD 
>>> about
>>> Axis after you/Benson worked it over. Do you think that's reasonable??! That
>>> is SOOO not the Apache Way, especially coming from two ASF Members.
>>>
>>> Yes we should've moved over. We haven't. In the meantime, ignore the
>>> directory and continue to update the Web site ignoring all history.
>>>
>>> I will find time to go edit "your" site one of these days and put back some
>>> history and context into this site. It is not your site or mine; its ours 
>>> and
>>> I damned well plan to claim back the rightful place Axis has in this 
>>> project!
>>> You cannot just go on as if it never existed :) .. however much you may wish
>>> for that to be the case.
>>>
>>> Sanjiva.
>>> --
>>> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
>>> Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation;
>>> http://www.opensource.lk/
>>> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2; http://wso2.com/
>>> Founder & Director; Thinkcube Systems; http://www.thinkcube.com/
>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>> Member; Sahana Software Foundation; http://www.sahanafoundation.org/
>>> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
>>>
>>> Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to