Will have a look Vindula. Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough to understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already.
Regards, Omindu. On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > Hi, > > I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your > feedback in improving the proposal. > > Thank you, > > *Vindula Jayawardana* > Computer Science and Engineering Dept. > University of Moratuwa > mobile : +713462554 > Email : vindul...@gmail.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> > <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> > <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> > > *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* > > > *-Richard Branson-* > > > > On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana <vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1]. >> Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing >> SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server >> instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to >> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support >> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are failing when >> run. >> >> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had been >> done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the /ServiceProviderConfigs >> endpoint [4] and was able to get the following output. >> >> >> >> >> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the >> test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature of >> the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas >> endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the >> endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not >> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object. >> >> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature >> to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT >> IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in >> the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit >> acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making >> sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test >> suit on other endpoints. >> >> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest >> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/ >> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7 >> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound- >> provisioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master >> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6 >> >> *Vindula Jayawardana* >> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >> University of Moratuwa >> mobile : +713462554 >> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >> >> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* >> >> >> *-Richard Branson-* >> >> >> >> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana <vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points >>> you have mentioned and will keep you updated here. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>> University of Moratuwa >>> mobile : +713462554 >>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>> >>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. >>> "* >>> >>> >>> *-Richard Branson-* >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Vindula, >>>> >>>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output, >>>> that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS >>>> instance publicly to run the tests on it. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Omindu. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your interest in this project. >>>>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you >>>>> please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0 >>>>> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from >>>>> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2] >>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info >>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferdtman%2Fsimplecloud.info&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGycfiBxzWbdCVjpGlABAw9OXxGaQ> >>>>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi >>>>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Gayan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer >>>>>> Science and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am >>>>>> interested in applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 >>>>>> compliance test suite" which you have offered for the GSoC project idea >>>>>> pool. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications >>>>>> for both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few >>>>>> blog posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM >>>>>> [2]. >>>>>> Also I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the >>>>>> references provided and would like to know more on the scope of the >>>>>> coverage report and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a >>>>>> deliverable. Could you kindly guide me on the said matter. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-it-fast-che >>>>>> ap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde >>>>>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-that-will-no >>>>>> t-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>> >>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>> Email: ga...@wso2.com >>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Omindu Rathnaweera Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94 771 197 211
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
