Hi, Kindly find the weekly update below.
Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code. In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1 /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as well. Thank you. *Vindula Jayawardana* Computer Science and Engineering Dept. University of Moratuwa mobile : +713462554 Email : vindul...@gmail.com <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* *-Richard Branson-* On 29 May 2017 at 10:50, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana < > vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test >> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following >> possibilities. >> > +1 > >> >> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a >> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base. >> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised >> regarding the current structure of the implementation. >> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon >> [2] code base as a start. >> >> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture >> only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4 >> architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge. >> > We will review [3],[4] btw can you continue the work with IS 6.0.0 in C5 ? > I guess for compliance test it won't make much difference. > >> >> I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture >> proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the >> coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint >> in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better >> understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS. >> > Great progress Vindula keep it up. > >> >> [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghv >> EPjczU4laE >> [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon >> [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provis >> ioning-scim2/pull/16 >> [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942 >> >> Thank you >> >> *Vindula Jayawardana* >> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >> University of Moratuwa >> mobile : +713462554 >> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >> >> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* >> >> >> *-Richard Branson-* >> >> >> >> On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana <vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Omindu, >>> >>> Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated >>> the suggestions you made on the proposal. >>> >>> As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options >>> more flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester >>> as an optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope >>> that would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test >>> suite in terms of configuration options. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>> University of Moratuwa >>> mobile : +713462554 >>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>> >>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. >>> "* >>> >>> >>> *-Richard Branson-* >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Will have a look Vindula. >>>> >>>> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention >>>> behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test >>>> suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough >>>> to understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be >>>> captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more >>>> flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't >>>> already. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Omindu. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your >>>>> feedback in improving the proposal. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> >>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>> >>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>> impress. "* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite >>>>>> [1]. Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet >>>>>> facing SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity >>>>>> Server instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due >>>>>> to >>>>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support >>>>>> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are >>>>>> failing when run. >>>>>> >>>>>> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had >>>>>> been done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the >>>>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs endpoint [4] and was able to get the >>>>>> following output. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as >>>>>> the test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the >>>>>> nature of the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock >>>>>> /Schemas endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking >>>>>> the endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not >>>>>> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in >>>>>> nature to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as >>>>>> 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be >>>>>> adopted in the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the >>>>>> test suit acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints >>>>>> while >>>>>> making sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run >>>>>> the test suit on other endpoints. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest >>>>>> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/ >>>>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7 >>>>>> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound-provi >>>>>> sioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master >>>>>> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#a >>>>>> nchor6 >>>>>> >>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>> >>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the >>>>>>> points you have mentioned and will keep you updated here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated >>>>>>>> output, that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> IS instance publicly to run the tests on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Omindu. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your interest in this project. >>>>>>>>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could >>>>>>>>> you please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM >>>>>>>>> 2.0 >>>>>>>>> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from >>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>> as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info >>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferdtman%2Fsimplecloud.info&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGycfiBxzWbdCVjpGlABAw9OXxGaQ> >>>>>>>>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi >>>>>>>>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Gayan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer >>>>>>>>>> Science and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am >>>>>>>>>> interested in applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 >>>>>>>>>> compliance test suite" which you have offered for the GSoC project >>>>>>>>>> idea >>>>>>>>>> pool. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol >>>>>>>>>> specifications for both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge >>>>>>>>>> I have >>>>>>>>>> written few blog posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use >>>>>>>>>> cases >>>>>>>>>> of SCIM [2]. Also I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I >>>>>>>>>> went >>>>>>>>>> though the references provided and would like to know more on the >>>>>>>>>> scope of the coverage report and detailed analysis view need to be >>>>>>>>>> generated as a deliverable. Could you kindly guide me on the said >>>>>>>>>> matter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajay >>>>>>>>>> awardana/scim-make-it-fast-cheap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde >>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajay >>>>>>>>>> awardana/5-things-that-will-not-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-yo >>>>>>>>>> u-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>>>>>> Email: ga...@wso2.com >>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>>>>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Gayan Gunawardana > Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > Email: ga...@wso2.com > Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
