Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to support Spark 2.0 using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty of doing so. I'm mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do it because Spark 2.0 isn't GA yet.")
Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark 2.0, and we don't make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be several months after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of Zeppelin is releasable and supports Spark 2.0. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24 AM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Spark 2.0 is still in preview in Spark community and is not yet GA. > I anticipate Spark 2.0 GA in next 3 weeks > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jonathan Kelly <jonathaka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Moon and community, > > > > Congrats on the graduation to a TLP! Releasing 0.6.0 after the infra > > changes sounds like a good idea. Would it be possible to get support for > > Spark 2.0 and Scala 2.11 into 0.6.0 too? > > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:26 AM moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > We have 0.5.6-incubating released on last Jan and a lot of users are > > asking > > > next release, since it's been quite long. > > > > > > I can see most of items on 0.6.0 roadmap [1] are now addressed, and > more > > > than 200 issues are resolved since the last release. > > > > > > Furthermore, as project graduate from incubator, project name, web site > > > address, mailing list address, etc will be changed. INFRA-11963 [2] > > tracks > > > those changes. I think it's good to reflect those changes with new > > release. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Regards, > > > moon > > > > > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11963 > > > > > >
