+1 on release branch+1 on dedicated release manager (thanks for volunteering,
Mina!)
_____________________________
From: mina lee <mina...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release
To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org>
Moon, I think it's good idea to cut the branch on 15 June.
As we discussed in previous release discussion thread [1], shall we take a
rotation for this release?
If so, I would like to volunteer this time.
But in the end, I think it would be better to have one dedicated release
manager like other apache projects do. It takes time for every new release
manager to get familiar with apache release process, set the environment,
etc. And I expect for community to be more structured at release by having
release manager who can takes more about release time, release scope.
regards,
mina
[1]
http://apache-zeppelin-dev-mailing-list.75694.x6.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Release-0-5-6-incubating-td4728i20.html
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Guillaume Alleon <guillaume.all...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Ho mon
>
> Do we have a branch using the preview release of spark 2.0?
>
> Cheers
> Guillaume
>
> Sent from a small device
>
> > On 08 Jun 2016, at 17:10, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > How about we create release branch 'branch-0.6' from master on 15 June,
> > 00:00 PDT, and start release process from that point?
> >
> > Most of TLP migration has been done (except for git source repo / mirror
> > migration) and we can always create minor release with spark 2.0 support
> if
> > spark 2.0 support is not ready when we cut the release branch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > moon
> >
> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP.
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 on release.If we could sort out Spark 2.0 great, if not we should
> have
> >>> a release anyway.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _____________________________
> >>> From: Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:44 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release
> >>> To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you Moon for starting discussion,
> >>> I can not agree more - it's time for another release, our first one as
> >> TLP!
> >>>
> >>> As you said - there are many improvements, more then enough for a new
> >>> release, but having Spark 2.0 profile there would be awesome.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016, 03:34 Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Kelly <
> >> jonathaka...@gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to support
> >> Spark
> >>>> 2.0
> >>>>> using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty of doing so.
> >>> I'm
> >>>>> mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do it because
> >>> Spark
> >>>>> 2.0 isn't GA yet.")
> >>>>
> >>>> Agree.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark 2.0, and we
> >> don't
> >>>>> make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be several
> >> months
> >>>>> after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of Zeppelin is
> >>>>> releasable and supports Spark 2.0.
> >>>> I think releasing Zeppelin as a TLP will be much more easy now :) So
> >>> there
> >>>> is always the possibility to have a minor release with Spark 2.0
> >> support
> >>> if
> >>>> we don't get it on this one.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Luciano Resende
> >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
>
