Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP. On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on release.If we could sort out Spark 2.0 great, if not we should have > a release anyway. > > > > _____________________________ > From: Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:44 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release > To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > Thank you Moon for starting discussion, > I can not agree more - it's time for another release, our first one as TLP! > > As you said - there are many improvements, more then enough for a new > release, but having Spark 2.0 profile there would be awesome. > > -- > Alex > > On Wed, May 25, 2016, 03:34 Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Kelly <jonathaka...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to support Spark > > 2.0 > > > using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty of doing so. > I'm > > > mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do it because > Spark > > > 2.0 isn't GA yet.") > > > > > > > Agree. > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark 2.0, and we don't > > > make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be several months > > > after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of Zeppelin is > > > releasable and supports Spark 2.0. > > > > > > > > I think releasing Zeppelin as a TLP will be much more easy now :) So > there > > is always the possibility to have a minor release with Spark 2.0 support > if > > we don't get it on this one. > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > >
