+1 On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Ahyoung Ryu <ahyoungry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Big +1 for 0.6.0 release. > > @Prabhjyot Appreciate for letting us know, finally we have *Zeppelin > *repository > not incubator-zeppelin :) > > 2016년 6월 9일 (목) 오후 1:56, Khalid Huseynov <khalid...@nflabs.com>님이 작성: > > > +1 on release. > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Prabhjyot Singh < > prabhjyotsi...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for release. > > > > > > And just noticed https://github.com/apache/zeppelin. > > > > > > > > > On 9 June 2016 at 23:29, Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for cutting a release ASAP > > > > > > > > And thank you Mina for volunteering to manage the next release! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016, 18:21 moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 on dedicated release manager (thanks for volunteering, Mina!) > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:41 AM Felix Cheung < > > felixcheun...@hotmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on release branch+1 on dedicated release manager (thanks for > > > > > > volunteering, Mina!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________ > > > > > > From: mina lee <mina...@apache.org> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 9:50 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release > > > > > > To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, I think it's good idea to cut the branch on 15 June. > > > > > > As we discussed in previous release discussion thread [1], shall > we > > > > take > > > > > a > > > > > > rotation for this release? > > > > > > If so, I would like to volunteer this time. > > > > > > > > > > > > But in the end, I think it would be better to have one dedicated > > > > release > > > > > > manager like other apache projects do. It takes time for every > new > > > > > release > > > > > > manager to get familiar with apache release process, set the > > > > environment, > > > > > > etc. And I expect for community to be more structured at release > by > > > > > having > > > > > > release manager who can takes more about release time, release > > scope. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > mina > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-zeppelin-dev-mailing-list.75694.x6.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Release-0-5-6-incubating-td4728i20.html > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Guillaume Alleon < > > > > > > guillaume.all...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ho mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have a branch using the preview release of spark 2.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from a small device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 08 Jun 2016, at 17:10, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about we create release branch 'branch-0.6' from master > on > > 15 > > > > > June, > > > > > > > > 00:00 PDT, and start release process from that point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of TLP migration has been done (except for git source > > repo / > > > > > > mirror > > > > > > > > migration) and we can always create minor release with spark > > 2.0 > > > > > > support > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > spark 2.0 support is not ready when we cut the release > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > moon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM Vinay Shukla < > > > > vinayshu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung < > > > > felixcheun...@hotmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> +1 on release.If we could sort out Spark 2.0 great, if not > we > > > > > should > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > >>> a release anyway. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> _____________________________ > > > > > > > >>> From: Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:44 PM > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release > > > > > > > >>> To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Thank you Moon for starting discussion, > > > > > > > >>> I can not agree more - it's time for another release, our > > first > > > > one > > > > > > as > > > > > > > >> TLP! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> As you said - there are many improvements, more then enough > > > for a > > > > > new > > > > > > > >>> release, but having Spark 2.0 profile there would be > awesome. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > >>> Alex > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016, 03:34 Luciano Resende < > > > > luckbr1...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Kelly < > > > > > > > >> jonathaka...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>> <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to > > > > support > > > > > > > >> Spark > > > > > > > >>>> 2.0 > > > > > > > >>>>> using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty > of > > > > doing > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > >>> I'm > > > > > > > >>>>> mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do > it > > > > > because > > > > > > > >>> Spark > > > > > > > >>>>> 2.0 isn't GA yet.") > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Agree. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark > 2.0, > > > and > > > > we > > > > > > > >> don't > > > > > > > >>>>> make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be > > > > several > > > > > > > >> months > > > > > > > >>>>> after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of > > > Zeppelin > > > > > is > > > > > > > >>>>> releasable and supports Spark 2.0. > > > > > > > >>>> I think releasing Zeppelin as a TLP will be much more easy > > now > > > > :) > > > > > So > > > > > > > >>> there > > > > > > > >>>> is always the possibility to have a minor release with > Spark > > > 2.0 > > > > > > > >> support > > > > > > > >>> if > > > > > > > >>>> we don't get it on this one. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>> Luciano Resende > > > > > > > >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > > > >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thankx and Regards, > > > > > > Prabhjyot Singh > > > > > >
