Thanks Jeff,

I made a new PR for handling this issue.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1981

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <
jzh...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Best Regard,
> Jeff Zhang
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/19/17, 1:03 AM, "Jongyoul Lee" <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I also agree that ppl don't care of the result of CI anymore even it's
> >real
> >failure. One possible solution is making umbrella ticket, grabbing flaky
> >tests, disabling at first and enabling when it solves. but it assumes we
> >need to do our best to fix the flaky tests. Otherwise, we will lose some
> >tests...
> >
> >How do you guys think of it?
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I'd agree. Is there a course of actions you can propose? Disable all
> >>these
> >> tests is a not a long term solution, right?
> >>
> >>
> >> _____________________________
> >> From: Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com<mailto:zjf...@gmail.com>>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:01 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Unstable travis CI recently
> >> To: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:dev@zeppelin.apache.org>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Should we disable these flaky test now ? CI seems become more unstable
> >> recently. It is almost useless for me, I never see a success CI
> >>recently.
> >> Here's one screenshot of recent closed PRs. Most of them has CI failure.
> >> IMO, this is pretty bad, especially for new contributors.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [pasted1]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jun Kim <i2r....@gmail.com<mailto:i2r....@gmail.com>>?2016?12?13???
> >> ??11:27???
> >> @Hoon Thanks for your information :-) I should use that next time!
> >>
> >> 2016? 12? 13? (?) ?? 8:23, Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com<mailto:1amb4
> >> a...@gmail.com>>?? ??:
> >>
> >> > I totally agree with your opinions. I will work on ZEPPELIN-1739,
> >> > ZEPPELIN-1749 first i reported before.
> >> >
> >> > @Jun Kim. So true. We have to wait long time. FYI, we can use our own
> >> > travis CI containers to test (I recently learned also!) by configuring
> >> > your-github-id/zeppelin-repo in travis CI
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Jun Kim
> >><i2r....@gmail.com<mailto:i2r.
> >> j...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I definitely agree with you!
> >> > >
> >> > > I reopened my PR twice recently to pass CI and it wasn't because of
> >>me.
> >> > >
> >> > > CI takes about ~40min for a test, so I had to wait 1h and 20min to
> >> write
> >> > a
> >> > > comment after passing CI T_T
> >> > >
> >> > > And the worst of it is that I don't believe CI's result more and
> >>more.
> >> > >
> >> > > 2016? 12? 13? (?) ?? 8:10, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com<mailto:
> zjffd
> >> u...@gmail.com>>?? ??:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Folks,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As you may notice that our travis CI is not stable recently.
> >>There's
> >> > many
> >> > > > flaky test, and it waste every developer's time to figure out
> >>whether
> >> > the
> >> > > > failure is due to your PR or flaky test. So I think it is time
> >>for us
> >> > to
> >> > > > make the CI stable. Here's tickets for all the flaky test.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >> > > 3D%20ZEPPELIN%20AND%20text%20~%20flaky%20and%20status%20!%
> >> > > 3D%20RESOLVED%20ORDER%20%20BY%20status%20ASC%20
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Fixing the flaky test may take some time and may not easy for some
> >> test
> >> > > but
> >> > > > I think it is worth to do that.  And it is better for these people
> >> who
> >> > > > familiar with that particular test case to fix it. What do you
> >>guys
> >> > > think ?
> >> > > > Thanks
> >> > > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Taejun Kim
> >> > >
> >> > > Data Mining Lab.
> >> > > School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> >> > > University of Seoul
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> --
> >> Taejun Kim
> >>
> >> Data Mining Lab.
> >> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> >> University of Seoul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
> >http://madeng.net
>
>


-- 
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net

Reply via email to