Thank you Amos Elberg & Eric Charles: Is the goal of the community to merge both 208 and 702 at some point as two “different” R interpreters?
One that is %r And another that is %spark.r Still trying to wrap my head around the difference. On 2/23/16, 9:34 AM, "Amos B. Elberg" <amos.elb...@gmail.com> wrote: >Jeff - 702 isn't a fork, it's an alternative based on 208 that has a subset of >208's features. 208 is the superset. 208 is also what the community is now >attempting to integrate. > >R does support serialization of functions. > >208 does support passing a spark table back and forth between R and scala. >Passing a data.frame through the Zeppelin context will fail in spark up to >1.5. It may now be working for some data frames in 1.6. > >There are examples that do all these things in the documentation for 208 on my >repo at github.com/elbamos/Zeppelin-With-R > >> On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Steinmetz <jeffrey.steinm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hello zeppelin dev group, >> >> Regarding the R Interpreter Pull requests 208 and 702. I am trying to >> figure out if the functionality between these are overlapping, or one >> supports something different than the other. Is 702 a super set of 208 (702 >> is a fork of 208)? >> >> Can you pass the reference of a distributed (parallelized) dataframe built >> in %spark (scala) to the R interpreter? Similar to z.put(“myDF", myDF)? >> >> Similarly, since R doesn’t support serialization of functions (unless you >> use something from the SparkR library) is there an example of collecting the >> parallel DF to a local DF (which I realize it means the dataset needs to fit >> in local memory on the zeppelin server). >> >> I can to dig into this a bit and help out where appropriate, however its >> unclear which PR to focus my efforts on. >> >> Best, >> Jeff Steinmetz >> Principal Architect >> Akili Interactive Labs >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 2/23/16, 8:01 AM, "elbamos" <g...@git.apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Github user elbamos commented on the pull request: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-187764059 >>> >>> @btiernay support for that has been in 208 all along... >>> >>>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 9:27 AM, Bob Tiernay <notificati...@github.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> @echarles This is great! Thanks for all your hard work. Very much >>>> appreciated! >>>> >>>> ╉ >>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your >>> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature >>> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please >>> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket >>> with INFRA. >>> --- >>
