I'd be happy to have Ted as both committer and mentor. I'd be happy to have Patrick and/or as mentor as well.
-JZ On 12/14/11 7:03 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi Jordan, Here is some feedback. I like the proposal and it makes sense >> to have such a project as either sub-project or incubator. I have a few >> concerns, though: >> >> 1- I haven't been following closely the development of the recipes, but >>I >> wonder if it really makes sense to deprecate the current ones in favor >>of >> Curator's, or if it is a better idea to keep multiple versions in the >>case >> of duplicates. People in the community have spent time on the current >> recipes, so I don't like very much the idea of dropping the current >>recipes >> without some evidence that the community accepts it. Note that I'm not >> saying that deprecating is not the right thing to do, I'm simply saying >> that we need to make sure that the community agrees. >> > >I agree that not deprecating is a good thing. We could mark them with >annotations that indicate that we haven't heard yet from a community of >users. If we don't hear about significant usage, then deprecation might >be >warranted. > >2- The set of committers needs to be more diverse. Perhaps it would be >> easier to find more committers if you follow the incubation process, >>given >> that typically people sign up for committership once you post a proposal >> there. I wonder how many other people on this list would like to >>volunteer >> to become a committer of Curator, though. I like the project, but >> unfortunately I don't have the cycles to do it. >> > >I would volunteer. > > >> 3- If Curator becomes a sub-project of ZooKeeper, then you need at least >> one mentor. Is there anyone who would like to sign up to mentor Curator? >> > >Likewise.
