[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13653263#comment-13653263
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1697:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks [~fpj]
bq. One advantage is that it concentrates the changes on LearnerHandler and it
is easier to read the code this way.
Agree. The encapsulation and code flow is much better.
bq. An instance of LearnerHandler may take up to initLimit to get to the point
that the leader is running.
I was thinking that the initLimit is the amount of time you allow the servers
to bootstrap and start serving, for me this included the initialization as well
as the initial "sync" period. I could see going either way, but if we did make
the change it seems like it would be odd - we do sock.setSoTimeout(initlimit)
in some places (during bootstrapping), based on your comment we should change
those as well? Why not have the operator just consider that (initi + sync) in
setting the initLimit?
> large snapshots can cause continuous quorum failure
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1697
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1697
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.4.3, 3.5.0
> Reporter: Patrick Hunt
> Assignee: Patrick Hunt
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.5.0, 3.4.6
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1697_branch34.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1697_branch34.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1697.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1697.patch
>
>
> I keep seeing this on the leader:
> 2013-04-30 01:18:39,754 INFO
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Leader: Shutdown called
> java.lang.Exception: shutdown Leader! reason: Only 0 followers, need 2
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Leader.shutdown(Leader.java:447)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Leader.lead(Leader.java:422)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.run(QuorumPeer.java:753)
> The followers are downloading the snapshot when this happens, and are
> trying to do their first ACK to the leader, the ack fails with broken
> pipe.
> In this case the snapshots are large and the config has increased the
> initLimit. syncLimit is small - 10 or so with ticktime of 2000. Note
> this is 3.4.3 with ZOOKEEPER-1521 applied.
> I originally speculated that
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1521 might be related.
> I thought I might have broken something for this environment. That
> doesn't look to be the case.
> As it looks now it seems that 1521 didn't go far enough. The leader
> verifies that all followers have ACK'd to the leader within the last
> "syncLimit" time period. This runs all the time in the background on
> the leader to identify the case where a follower drops. In this case
> the followers take so long to load the snapshot that this check fails
> the very first time, as a result the leader drops (not enough ack'd
> followers w/in the sync limit) and re-election happens. This repeats
> forever. (the above error)
> this is the call:
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.LearnerHandler.synced() that's at
> odds.
> look at setting of tickOfLastAck in
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.LearnerHandler.run()
> It's not set until the follower first acks - in this case I can see
> that the followers are not getting to the ack prior to the leader
> shutting down due to the error log above.
> It seems that sync() should probably use the init limit until the
> first ack comes in from the follower. I also see that while tickOfLastAck and
> leader.self.tick is shared btw two threads there is no synchronization of the
> shared resources.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
