> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/PrepRequestProcessor.java, line 
> > 147
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845237#file845237line147>
> >
> >     Why interrupt() here?
> >     Add comments please.

When we catch and swallow InterruptedException, one common pattern is -  call 
Thread.currentThread().interrupt() afterward, so that the interrupt status 
isn't lost.


> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperCriticalThread.java, 
> > line 46
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845240#file845240line46>
> >
> >     thName -> threadName

Ok


> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperCriticalThread.java, 
> > line 47
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845240#file845240line47>
> >
> >     The logging is duplicate to that in notifyStopping().
> >     
> >     I think we should remove the one in notifyStopping() because we might 
> > want to print exception stack.

ofcourse, will remove duplicates


> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperCriticalThread.java, 
> > line 48
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845240#file845240line48>
> >
> >     this.getName() -> threadName

ok


> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LearnerZooKeeperServer.java,
> >  line 168
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845249#file845249line168>
> >
> >     Isn't "running" set to false in super.shutdown()?

Yes, it synchronization should be improved further. Initially I thought of 
minimizing the scope of synchronized block, but I think it will not work out. 
Now, am planning to make both #startup() and #shutdown() synchronized methods. 
Any comments?

synchronized startup()
    //...
}

synchronized shutdown(){
    if(!isRunning()){ return; }
    super.shutdown();
    // ...
}


> On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> > ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ObserverZooKeeperServer.java,
> >  line 135
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/4-5/?file=845252#file845252line135>
> >
> >     Same.. it's always false.

sure, will change this logic.


- Rakesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/#review71262
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 5, 2015, 6:32 p.m., Rakesh R wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 5, 2015, 6:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for zookeeper, michim, Raul Gutierrez Segales, and Camille 
> Fournier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ZOOKEEPER-1907
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
> 
> 
> Repository: zookeeper
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Improve the thread handling mechanism by detecting if any of the critical 
> thread dies.
> Here the idea is to periodically checking the status of all the critical 
> threads in ZK server using DeathWatcherThread.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ExitCode.java PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/PrepRequestProcessor.java 
> 1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/SessionTrackerImpl.java 1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/SyncRequestProcessor.java 
> 1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperCriticalThread.java 
> 1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperServer.java 1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperServerListener.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/CommitProcessor.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/FollowerRequestProcessor.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/FollowerZooKeeperServer.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LeaderSessionTracker.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LeaderZooKeeperServer.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LearnerSessionTracker.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LearnerZooKeeperServer.java
>  1657623 
>   ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LocalSessionTracker.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ObserverRequestProcessor.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ObserverZooKeeperServer.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ProposalRequestProcessor.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReadOnlyRequestProcessor.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/ReadOnlyZooKeeperServer.java
>  1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/UpgradeableSessionTracker.java
>  1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/PrepRequestProcessorTest.java 
> 1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/SessionTrackerTest.java 1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperThreadTest.java 
> 1657623 
>   
> ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/CommitProcessorConcurrencyTest.java
>  1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/CommitProcessorTest.java 
> 1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/ClientBase.java 1657623 
>   ./src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/SessionTrackerCheckTest.java 
> 1657623 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20071/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> yet to be inlcuded
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rakesh R
> 
>

Reply via email to