I've left some time back a request to have it somewhere so that I could leave some specific review comments and asked a question about the API changes.
I'd like to understand at a high level what we are trying to achieve. For example, the description of the jira mentions that the goal is to enable nodes to expire without relying on sessions. Does it imply that this is for applications that will rely purely on local sessions? Should we provide a way of not having sessions at all, global or local? My sense is that this is a great feature and I'm happy to see a patch and discussion, but I feel that we need to discuss it further so that we understand how this is going to be used. At least, I'd like to understand it better. -Flavio > On 29 Aug 2016, at 13:11, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > > Per Benjamin: "i'm fine letting it go in as is" > >> On Aug 26, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks Camille! It's fine with me, although notice that Flavio has been >> providing feedback and has some concerns. Also there is a pending issue >> (testing) identified by Ben most recently and afaict not yet resolved. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> OK I'm the slacker that proposed us doing this in the first place and I'm >>> THRILLED that you have done it Jordan, thank you so much. >>> Pat, I can review and merge, unless you are concerned with interference on >>> other issues. LMK. >>> >>> C >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jordan. This looks like a great new feature, but I'm afraid I'm >>> focused >>>> on other things atm. I don't have much time after work/home currently, as >>>> such I've been focused on other priorities; 1) supporting existing >>>> users/issues in 3.4, and 2) trying to get 3.5 branch to production ready. >>>> There are already a number of features queued up in that branch (3.5) >>> which >>>> we need to get out to folks. Thanks for your patience. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>>> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So - what’s a guy got to do to get this merged? >>>>> >>>>> -Jordan >>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Please >>>>>> This looks really handy for implementing transient data structures. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>>>>> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Any chance of getting https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>> jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169 >>>>>>> merged? It has: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * A patch that’s been reviewed >>>>>>> * 7 Votes >>>>>>> * 15 Watchers >>>>>>> * Will help ZooKeeper compete against etcd/consul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Jordan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>> Hein >>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
