Ok, I can have a look at ZK-2901. I'd like to get ZK-2982 in as well as it is 
causing us problems with Kubernetes. The fix is simple, but I'm wondering about 
adding a test case.

-Flavio

> On 14 Mar 2018, at 17:30, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut
>> a 3.5.4 release?
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck on ZOOKEEPER-2901 . I
>>> think we getting closer but it's been tricky to navigate addressing the
>>> issue vs backward compat vs making things worse. I was about to sign off
>>> then noticed I had missed something. Jordan has been working to address.
>>> 
>>> Camille, Edward -- it would be good if you could take a look at 2901
>> given
>>> you participated in the original creation/commit of this feature.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Karan Mehta <karanmeht...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Can we get ZOOKEEPER-2770
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770> in as well? The
>> PR
>>>> is ready for review at https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/307
>>>> It will be a nice feature addition. Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Karan
>>>> ᐧ
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Afaict the only real blocker for the release at this point is
>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-2901 - Jordan can you resolve the comments, after which we
>>>>> should
>>>>>> be good to go. LMK if there's anything I'm missing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll have this done in the next day or so. Please wait for me if you
>> can!
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Jordan
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to