No one has looked at 2901, while I'm not super happy with it it seems fine - I'll commit it as-is if I don't hear anything by EOD tomorrow (Monday). After which I'll start the release process.
Patrick On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Andor Molnar <an...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I'm currently working on ZOOKEEPER-2184. PR has been open for ages on 3.4 > branch, please review if you have some capacity. > I'll port the fix to the 3.5 branch too, if we have an agreement and > 3.4-version is merged. > > ZK-2982 is somewhat related, I believe my changes will fix that one too. > > ZK-1818 is probably tough, but patch is already available. Somebody should > pick it up, which I'm happy to do once finished with above stuff. > > Regards, > Andor > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Michael Han <h...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 on 3.5.4 release planning. > > > > >> There are 10 open blocker issues marked for 3.5.4. Can I get some help > > to sort out those issues? > > > > The url posted does not work for me, here is the query I use: > > https://goo.gl/3MJZMN > > > > Just had a chance to go through the JIRA and did some clean ups. > > - 1159: lower the priority from blocker to major. > > - 761: resolved because the code is merged. > > > > ZOOKEEPER-2903, 2184, 2982 looks like real blockers for the 3.5.4 > release. > > The rest of the blockers are legacy that's get postponed indefinitely. > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Ok, I can have a look at ZK-2901. I'd like to get ZK-2982 in as well as > > it > > > is causing us problems with Kubernetes. The fix is simple, but I'm > > > wondering about adding a test case. > > > > > > -Flavio > > > > > > > On 14 Mar 2018, at 17:30, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though. > > > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will > we > > > cut > > > >> a 3.5.4 release? > > > >> > > > >> -Flavio > > > >> > > > >>> On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck on ZOOKEEPER-2901 > > . I > > > >>> think we getting closer but it's been tricky to navigate addressing > > the > > > >>> issue vs backward compat vs making things worse. I was about to > sign > > > off > > > >>> then noticed I had missed something. Jordan has been working to > > > address. > > > >>> > > > >>> Camille, Edward -- it would be good if you could take a look at > 2901 > > > >> given > > > >>> you participated in the original creation/commit of this feature. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> > > > >>> Patrick > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Karan Mehta < > > karanmeht...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Can we get ZOOKEEPER-2770 > > > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770> in as > well? > > > The > > > >> PR > > > >>>> is ready for review at https://github.com/apache/ > zookeeper/pull/307 > > > >>>> It will be a nice feature addition. Thanks! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards > > > >>>> Karan > > > >>>> ᐧ > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > > > >>>> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>> Afaict the only real blocker for the release at this point is > > > >>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-2901 - Jordan can you resolve the comments, after > which > > we > > > >>>>> should > > > >>>>>> be good to go. LMK if there's anything I'm missing. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I'll have this done in the next day or so. Please wait for me if > > you > > > >> can! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -Jordan > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
