Greetings all,
As pointed out by Damien Diederen, there are many discrepancies in release
notes. Because of this RC0 is cancelled.
I will publish RC1 soon.
Thanks Damien for your valuable inputs.
Thanks Patric sir for your timely voting

Thanks & Regards
Arshad


On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 4:55 PM Damien Diederen <ddiede...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Arshad,
>
> Generally looks good—but see my point about releases notes below.
>
> +1 (advisory):
>
>   * Tarball contents match repository tag;
>
>   * Verified checksums and signatures;
>
>   * Built and smoke-tested on NixOS with a slightly adapted version of
>     the Nix recipe;
>
>   * Smoke-tested a standalone server with the (corresponding) Java, C
>     and Perl clients, as well as the zkfuse contrib;
>
>   * Smoke-tested a 3-ensemble with the (corresponding) Java client and
>     SASL/GSSAPI.
>
> It seems that there were some errors in the bug tracker's "Fix
> Version/s" field which in turn caused the release notes to be slightly
> inconsistent:
>
>  1. ZOOKEEPER-3774, ZOOKEEPER-3798, ZOOKEEPER-3841 and ZOOKEEPER-3858
>     are mentioned, but seem to only be present in master;
>
>  2. ZOOKEEPER-3933 and ZOOKEEPER-3934 are mentioned, but these tickets
>     were closed without any changes;
>
>  3. ZOOKEEPER-3931 is in 3.6.3, but not mentioned as the ticket has not
>     been closed;
>
>  4. ZOOKEEPER-3957, ZOOKEEPER-3980 and ZOOKEEPER-3992 are in 3.6.3, but
>     not mentioned as the tickets are only tagged with 3.7.0.
>
> The annoying bit, of course, is that releasenotes.md is on the release
> branch. Corrections should be applied there if another RC is published.
> I, for one, would be fine with only applying corrections to the website
> and in a subsequent commit if RC 0 is promoted to release status.
>
> Best, -D
>
> P.-S. — I have *not* tested under Ubuntu, nor have I used the staging
>   repo.  These are important points, but I figured most other testers
>   would focus on them.  Holler if that turns out not to be the case!
>
>
>
> Mohammad Arshad <ars...@apache.org> writes:
> > This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.6.3. It contains 51 fixes.
> >
> > The full release notes is available at:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12348703
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, April 6th 2021, 23:59
> UTC+0.
> > ***
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > https://people.apache.org/~arshad/zookeeper-3.6.3-candidate-0/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1068/
> >
> > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.6.3-0
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.6.3-0
> >
> > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> >
> > The staging version of the website is:
> > https://people.apache.org/~arshad/zookeeper-3.6.3-candidate-0/website/
> >
> > Should we release this candidate?
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Arshad
>

Reply via email to