Il Dom 4 Apr 2021, 13:32 Mohammad Arshad <arshad.mohamma...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Hi Enrico
> Created RC1 and sent a release vote Email.
> Cancelled RC0 and created RC1 for two reasons,
> 1. Release notes are also part of source code, binary tarball etc. so i
> thought it is better to correct it everywhere.
> 2. I had sent a release vote email twice
>

Works for me
Thanks
I will checkout the new RC probably tomorrow

Enrico


> Thanks & Regards
> Arshad
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 11:00 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just fyi I was going to cast my +1.
> >
> > As pointed out by Damien we can fix up the release notes after the
> release,
> > it is o ly a website change, no need to nuke an RC.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Built sources and run all tests on Ubuntu + jdk8
> > Run smoke tests on mac jdk8 and jdk17ea
> > Validated checksums and signatures
> > Validated rat and checkstyle
> >
> > Mohammad if you did not delete the Maven repo and the staged artifacts
> IMHO
> > we can continue to vote  this RC.
> > But it is your call as RM
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il Dom 4 Apr 2021, 06:44 Mohammad Arshad <ars...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Greetings all,
> > > As pointed out by Damien Diederen, there are many discrepancies in
> > release
> > > notes. Because of this RC0 is cancelled.
> > > I will publish RC1 soon.
> > > Thanks Damien for your valuable inputs.
> > > Thanks Patric sir for your timely voting
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Arshad
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 4:55 PM Damien Diederen <ddiede...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Arshad,
> > > >
> > > > Generally looks good—but see my point about releases notes below.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (advisory):
> > > >
> > > >   * Tarball contents match repository tag;
> > > >
> > > >   * Verified checksums and signatures;
> > > >
> > > >   * Built and smoke-tested on NixOS with a slightly adapted version
> of
> > > >     the Nix recipe;
> > > >
> > > >   * Smoke-tested a standalone server with the (corresponding) Java, C
> > > >     and Perl clients, as well as the zkfuse contrib;
> > > >
> > > >   * Smoke-tested a 3-ensemble with the (corresponding) Java client
> and
> > > >     SASL/GSSAPI.
> > > >
> > > > It seems that there were some errors in the bug tracker's "Fix
> > > > Version/s" field which in turn caused the release notes to be
> slightly
> > > > inconsistent:
> > > >
> > > >  1. ZOOKEEPER-3774, ZOOKEEPER-3798, ZOOKEEPER-3841 and ZOOKEEPER-3858
> > > >     are mentioned, but seem to only be present in master;
> > > >
> > > >  2. ZOOKEEPER-3933 and ZOOKEEPER-3934 are mentioned, but these
> tickets
> > > >     were closed without any changes;
> > > >
> > > >  3. ZOOKEEPER-3931 is in 3.6.3, but not mentioned as the ticket has
> not
> > > >     been closed;
> > > >
> > > >  4. ZOOKEEPER-3957, ZOOKEEPER-3980 and ZOOKEEPER-3992 are in 3.6.3,
> but
> > > >     not mentioned as the tickets are only tagged with 3.7.0.
> > > >
> > > > The annoying bit, of course, is that releasenotes.md is on the
> release
> > > > branch. Corrections should be applied there if another RC is
> published.
> > > > I, for one, would be fine with only applying corrections to the
> website
> > > > and in a subsequent commit if RC 0 is promoted to release status.
> > > >
> > > > Best, -D
> > > >
> > > > P.-S. — I have *not* tested under Ubuntu, nor have I used the staging
> > > >   repo.  These are important points, but I figured most other testers
> > > >   would focus on them.  Holler if that turns out not to be the case!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mohammad Arshad <ars...@apache.org> writes:
> > > > > This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.6.3. It contains 51
> fixes.
> > > > >
> > > > > The full release notes is available at:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12348703
> > > > >
> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, April 6th 2021,
> 23:59
> > > > UTC+0.
> > > > > ***
> > > > >
> > > > > Source and binary files:
> > > > > https://people.apache.org/~arshad/zookeeper-3.6.3-candidate-0/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1068/
> > > > >
> > > > > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.6.3-0
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.6.3-0
> > > > >
> > > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> > > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > The staging version of the website is:
> > > > >
> > https://people.apache.org/~arshad/zookeeper-3.6.3-candidate-0/website/
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we release this candidate?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > > Arshad
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to