Looks good to me! Thanks Michael!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kubacki <mikub...@linux.microsoft.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 9:35 PM
> To: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.c...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.z...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 5/7] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec: Remove
> duplicate LibraryClasses entry
> 
> If that's your intention, yes the CI can allow that. I've pushed a v2 
> candidate
> branch of this series here with your review tags provided so far.
> 
> https://github.com/makubacki/edk2/tree/add_missing_ci_yaml_intel_fsp_pkgs_
> v2
> 
> This patch (v1 5/7) is removed from that branch and the change to explicitly
> allow this is in the following commit on that branch:
> 
> https://github.com/makubacki/edk2/commit/b11dd1a4f59a62b90ed401b6b7ca
> d889dd1e013f#diff-
> ba7b110a0ec2f7f8fabc973b327ddb98a7d65b6a00b544a609a56593e6b87be3R8
> 0-R86
> 
> If that looks good, let me know and I can send the v2 series on the list after
> leaving v1 open for a bit longer to collect other feedback and reviews.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> 
> On 9/6/2022 11:49 PM, Chiu, Chasel wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > In this case we intended to provide a single-small function in separate 
> > library
> for platform customization so platforms do not have to override the whole main
> library instance, and I think it is not valuable to create another H file to 
> hold this
> single small library function. Is it possible to support such scenario in CI?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chasel
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
> >> Michael Kubacki
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 8:19 PM
> >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> >> Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.c...@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> >> <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 5/7] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec: Remove
> >> duplicate LibraryClasses entry
> >>
> >> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kuba...@microsoft.com>
> >>
> >> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4048
> >>
> >> The last [LibraryClasses] entry for FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseLib
> >> points to the same entry as FspWrapperMultiPhaseProcessLib.
> >>
> >> FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseHandler() is the only function
> >> implemented in FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseLibNull.c and it is only
> >> called (not implemented) in PeiFspWrapperMultiPhaseProcessLib.c,
> >> so I'd assume:
> >>
> >> - Producing library: FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseLib
> >> - Consuming library: FspWrapperMultiPhaseProcessLib
> >>
> >> But, the API descriptions do not provide any descriptive information:
> >>
> >> FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseHandler():
> >>
> >> ```
> >> /**
> >>    FSP Wrapper Platform MultiPhase Handler
> >>
> >>    @param[in] FspHobListPtr        - Pointer to FSP HobList (valid
> >>                                      after FSP-M completed)
> >>    @param[in] ComponentIndex       - FSP Component which executing
> >>                                      MultiPhase initialization.
> >>    @param[in] PhaseIndex           - Indicates current execution phase
> >>                                      of FSP MultiPhase initialization.
> >>
> >>    @retval EFI_STATUS        Always return EFI_SUCCESS
> >>
> >> **/
> >> ```
> >>
> >> In any case, this removes the redundant header file entry so the
> >> Library Class Check CI test can pass on the package.
> >>
> >> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.c...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kuba...@microsoft.com>
> >> ---
> >>   IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec | 4 ----
> >>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec
> >> b/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec
> >> index 95ada0f7a151..c3bbc5c45517 100644
> >> --- a/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec
> >> +++ b/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg/IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.dec
> >> @@ -32,10 +32,6 @@ [LibraryClasses]
> >>     ##  @libraryclass  Provide MultiPhase handling related functions.
> >>
> >> FspWrapperMultiPhaseProcessLib|Include/Library/FspWrapperMultiPhasePr
> >> FspWrapperMultiPhaseProcessLib|oce
> >> ssLib.h
> >>
> >> -  ##  @libraryclass  Provide MultiPhase platform actions related 
> >> functions.
> >> -
> >> FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseLib|Include/Library/FspWrapperMultiPhaseP
> >> FspWrapperPlatformMultiPhaseLib|roc
> >> essLib.h
> >> -
> >> -
> >>   [Guids]
> >>     #
> >>     # GUID defined in package
> >> --
> >> 2.28.0.windows.1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> >> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >> View/Reply Online (#93319):
> >> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/93319
> >> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93518040/1777047
> >> Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
> >> Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub
> >> [chasel.c...@intel.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=
> >>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#93335): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/93335
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93518040/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to