On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 12:51 PM Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 10/27/23 23:11, Michael Kubacki wrote: > > I'd like to bring attention to Apache License 2.0 code in the CodeQL > > series I sent to the mailing list for steward review. > > > > In particular, the files in the BaseTools/Plugin/CodeQL/analyze > > directory of this patch: > > > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/109696 > > > > Please let me know if any next steps are needed. > > (1) I don't know if edk2 accepts contributions under Apache License 2.0; > just want to point out that this license is acceptable in Fedora (and so > RHEL too), per > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/>. Assuming > we're talking about "Apache Software License 2.0". > > (2) Should we extend "License Details" and "Code Contributions" in > "ReadMe.rst"? > > (3) Should the new files (under Apache License 2.0) use an SPDX > identifier tag, for easy greppability?
I would welcome replacing *all* copyright notices with SPDX tags. Would also end the "Copyright (c) Corp Corporation" churn that regularly happens in EDK2! -- Pedro -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#110443): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110443 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102230244/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
