>> smsbox "global-sender" takes precedence over any smsc "default-sender", so >> for this to work you must not set "global-sender".
>shouldn't it be the opposite? >kaido The way sendsms requests get their way, I think this is not an easy thing to do. First, smsbox takes the request and if it has an empty sender, it puts "global-sender". smsbox does not know about smsc's. Then, bearerbox takes the request, and it checks for an empty sender. If so, it puts the right smsc "default-sender". I do not see a way to do your proposal without breaking smsbox/bearerbox interface. Anyway, I'm happy with the way I implemented that. In real life, one could have several smsc links, and have the same sender number for all of them. Then set global-sender and that's enough. Or one (like me) could have several smsc links, each of them requiring a diferent sender. Then leave global-sender unset, and set each smsc default-sender properly. Angel Fradejas.
