Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account. So we'd have
smsbox global-sender sms-service faked-sender smsc default-sender And of course an optional &from= in every message. And bearerbox behaviour would be &from= never overrideable by smsc default-sender global-sender overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by smsbox) faked-sender overrideable by smsc default-sender (only if applied by smsbox) an empty sender overrideable by smsc default-sender I do not know the impact of having message in bearerbox with an empty sender. Will any driver complain about that? Before going any further with this implementation, I would like to hear what to do if a message goes all the way to bearerbox with an empty sender and there's not default-sender. Angel Fradejas. -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Stefan Cars Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 12:25 Para: Andreas Fink CC: Angel Fradejas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ? That sounds very good ----------------- Stefan Cars CTO Globalwire Communications Phone: +46 18 10 79 50 Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69 Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00 On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Andreas Fink wrote: > how about this for global sender idea: > > We add another field to the message structure which is a flag > indicating that the number was set as a "default" number and it can > be replaced if there's another more specific default overriding it? > > this will make a global default sender overrideable by a smsc > specific global sender. > -- > > Andreas Fink > Fink-Consulting > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 > Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink >