Jaap Bouma wrote: > > The site still stays 1.0.3 is production and 1.1.5 is definitely NOT > production. > > What's the official status on this, and perhaps it would be nice to say > something more specific on the website.
it's hard to tell what the "official" status is, IMHO. I don't know if we will backport bugfixes in the current CVS tree to 1.0.3. It would be a lot of work and there seems not to be any interest as we have a relatively stable version in CVS. >From my perspective I would like to tag current CVS as development. As soon as we have the major showstoppers issues (see STATUS file) solved and at least a couple of us have that version running in productive environment for some time (a week or so) I would tag this as stable and go on. BTW, holding two branches, stable and development is rather work-intesive at least for the release manager. A lot other open source projects do it with single versioning, are there any objections for that? I would like to see discussion if the remaining developers prefer the two branch or one branch method. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
