Citando Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi list, > > if Wapme releases it's SMPP server implementation (smppbox) to kannel, > would we include it directly to kannel's gateway cvs module, or would > we inheritate an own module called smppbox? > > The benefit of having an own module would imply that other SMSC server > implementation, i.e. EMI/UCP maybe called emibox and hence a cleaner > code seperation would be present. > > I think smsbox should be a base interface to bearerbox (using common > HTTP for the low level user and aggregator) and smppbox, emibox and > whatever would be more for the professional SMS carriers and hosters.
I like the idea of modules although I'd prefer the apache solution than a *box executable one. Like a kannel executable, then a /usr/lib/kannel/1.4/mod_emi.so, a mod_http, mod_rpc, mod_jabber, mod_piggeons for inputs, a mod_db_file, mod_db_xSQL. But with kill -HUP `pidof kannel` ;) But that's for version 2.0, right ? This way, we whould really have a cvs://kannel, cvs://mod_* module directories, and a well defined interface between them - this is the harder part. > Any comments?! > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are > > -- <BR/>
