Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > I like the idea of modules although I'd prefer the apache solution than a *box > executable one. > > Like a kannel executable, then a /usr/lib/kannel/1.4/mod_emi.so, a mod_http, > mod_rpc, mod_jabber, mod_piggeons for inputs, a mod_db_file, mod_db_xSQL.
yep, that would be great. > But with kill -HUP `pidof kannel` ;) agreed too :)) > But that's for version 2.0, right ? I guess. At least it's not very simple in porting everything to Apache module API style. AFAIK some of the Apache people are still "listening" to our devel@ mailing list. Maybe they could pre-assume how "difficult" this would be. > > This way, we whould really have a cvs://kannel, cvs://mod_* module directories, > and a well defined interface between them - this is the harder part. yep, agreed. The API is definetly the hardest thing. But as HTTP is a well-defined proto so should our SMS transaction be well-defined. Some kannel parts, like the gwlib modules and the internal SMS msg API is well-defined IMO. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
