here is additional information what CIMD2 reports:
2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: CIMD2[mysmsc]: Submit message response contained error
message:
2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: code 310: Incorrect status report request parameter
usage
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> I would like to ask Angel, as CIMD2 guru, is there any way to check out
> if CIMD2 SMSC supports status delivery report requests?
>
> currently the logic is simple:
>
> if (msg->sms.dlr_mask & 0x03)
> {
> packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 14);
> }
> else
> packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 0);
>
> the problem is that if CIMD2 doesn't support status report,
> packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 0) would
> still cause a reject from SMSC not sending message at all. the only
> solution I found was to send nothing about P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST (i.e.
> commenting out the line).
>
> unfortunately I don't know if our provider has prohibited it using the
> right issues (i.e. configuration file or something), so stating that my
> operator's CIMD2 "doesn't support DLR" is not true. it's just forbidden :)
>
> regards,
> Dziugas Baltrunas
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> > >I currently was writing a question to the mailing list about plans to
> > >rewrite CIMD2 to smsconn :))
> > >
> > >great job, Angel.
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >Dziugas Baltrunas
> >
> > mmmm not to worry anybody, but I'm currently debugging and optimizing some
> > issues in the driver.... What I'd really like is to make it work the same
> > way as SMPP in transceiver mode.
> >
> > Well, first I'll fix it, then think about new internal design.
> >
> > Angel Fradejas
> > Mediafusión Espa?a, S.A.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > www.mediafusion.es
> > Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
> > Fax +34 91 572 27 08
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
