> Comments/votes please! > I did a quick test and seemed to work fine, thanks! Some comments: a) seems like the directory must exist already or bad things happen b) should we rename config value it as 'store-dir' or 'store-spool-dir' or something?
otherwise +1 > P.S. should we have multiple types of store-file support in kannel? it would > be easy to add config option like 'store-type=[file|spool]'. what are you > think about? What would be the _real_ benefits of using the old 'file'? If there really are, then yes, but otherwise not - maybe not need backward compatibility? PS. Am I the only one who gets a bit annoyed of all the still reserved memory areas reported when Kannel exits? Back in old times all of those would have been cleansed... :] -- &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
