Hi,
why not simple define port in smsbox group always. so it would be
possible: a) easier split bearerbox smsbox on different hosts w/o a need
to define core group; b) tell smsbox to connect to any port also to sqlbox
Anyway we have bearerbox-host config variable already in place, so just
add bearerbox-port to smsbox group. That's it...
Thanks,
Alex
Mi Reflejo schrieb:
Hi Stipe,
On 6/14/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that's a problem indeed. AFAIU the smsbox connects to the sqlbox
rather then the
bearerbox port. So sqlbox acts (from the view of smsbox) as bearerbox.
Ok, that's why you guys need to seperate and add the config. But I
think you
should use a different .conf file for sqlbox, where the "normal
bearerbox port"
is set addequate to reflect the sqlbox(bearerbox)-port. This is a
benefit, since
it doesn't require to patch smsbox at all. Right?
So, using 2 configs with core groups different for bearerbox port
would solve
the smsbox patching need.
I don't see how a different config file *only* for sqlbox will solve
anything since smsbox is who needs bearerbox port to connect. If we
use a different .conf file *only* for sqlbox, smsbox would still
connecting to original bearerbox-port.
If we take this way, maybe a very ugly solution is to start smsbox and
sqlbox with one config file and bearerbox with other but i don't like
this way.
M
