yes, please read userguide for details... Thanks, Alexander Malysh
Am 24.02.2011 um 16:31 schrieb Sanjay Bhandari: > Does that allow me to do these two simultaneously? > > SMSC <==> bearerbox <==> smsbox <==> applications > ESMEE <==> bearerbox <==> smsbox <==> applications > > Or is it that no traffic will be able to go out to the SMSC at all? Like, > > ESMEE <==> smppbox <==> bearerbox <==> loop SMSC <==> bearerbox > <==> smsbox <==> applications > > Is all traffic outboud to SMSC looped back? > > Sanjay > > On 2/24/2011 9:38 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> bearerbox has loop SMSC module. This allow you to loop traffic via bearerbox >> to smsbox... >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander Malysh >> >> Am 24.02.2011 um 14:22 schrieb Sanjay Bhandari: >> >>> A few others suggested this as well, so I looked into it. >>> >>> Correct me if I am wrong, but opensmppbox and smppbox direct traffic >>> from ESMEEs towards bearerbox, and eventually the SMSCs. Our use case is >>> such that we want to enable SMS flow between ESMEEs and smsbox (and >>> eventually the applications talking to smsbox). >>> >>> Here is what we are after. Kannel does the following now: >>> >>> SMSC <==> bearerbox <==> smsbox <==> applications >>> >>> We need to enable the following: >>> >>> ESMEE <==> bearerbox <==> smsbox <==> applications >>> >>> As you can see, this requires bearerbox to be the SMSC on the SMPP >>> protocol bind. Hence my question. But, of course, any configuration is >>> fine as long as the SMS flow between ESMEEs and applications is enabled. >>> >>> ESMEE <==> whatever <==> smsbox <==> applications >>> >>> Do you have a suggestion for that? >>> >>> Sanjay >>> >>> On 2/24/2011 5:55 AM, Stipe Tolj wrote: >>>> Am 23.02.2011 20:12, schrieb Sanjay Bhandari: >>>>> We have a bind where the peer wants to act as the ESMEE. I can't find a >>>>> way to >>>>> configure Kannel as an SMSC. Am I missing it somehow? >>>>> >>>>> More importantly, if we decided to modify the code to try and support the >>>>> SMSC >>>>> role, are there any hidden gotchas that we should be aware of? I guess, I >>>>> am >>>>> wondering why this capability is not implemented in Kannel already. Are >>>>> there >>>>> any blocking reasons? >>>> Kannel has 2 options to act as SMPP server: >>>> >>>> a) via the open source Kannel opensmppbox, which is located in the SVN >>>> trunk >>>> repository. >>>> >>>> b) via the commercial add-on Kannel SMPP v3.4 server (smppbox), which has >>>> a much >>>> wider complexity and feature scope, including a plugin API layer for >>>> additional >>>> logics and various accounting support methods. >>>> >>>> In case you're interested in b), please let me know. >>>> >>>> Stipe >>>> >>
