On 15 Jun 2016 17:47, "Matthew Miller" <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > That's precisely what they are doing on non-Ubuntu distributions, > > > disabling confinement. > > Thats is pretty crappy. That means things will keep accidentally being > > packaged that depends on things not in the ubuntu core. It also means > > that there is zero sandboxing. > > Can you elaborate on how this is different from Flatpak's > currently-rather-open sandboxing (as seen elsewhere in this thread)? > > -- >
Perhaps because flatpak doesn't tell the user to disable selinux and is not being actively promoted as the new secure application deployment technology being embraced by multiple major distributions?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
