On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 12:46 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > That's precisely what they are doing on non-Ubuntu distributions, > > > disabling confinement. > > Thats is pretty crappy. That means things will keep accidentally being > > packaged that depends on things not in the ubuntu core. It also means > > that there is zero sandboxing. > > Can you elaborate on how this is different from Flatpak's > currently-rather-open sandboxing (as seen elsewhere in this thread)?
It's different in that we're not issuing press releases loudly touting how great it is. i.e. we're following responsible development practices: while the product isn't actually done yet, we're talking about it on blogs and at developer conferences and working to complete it. While *their* product isn't actually done yet, Canonical is issuing press releases which beg their readers to infer that a) Snappy is completely done and b) all distributions have adopted it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
