> From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:14
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me
> 
> On 16/06/16 13:39 +0000, John Florian wrote:
> >Oh cool and here I've been waiting to have this available outside of
> GNOME (as a Plasma user).  However, I'm confused by my first experiment
> with it:
> >
> >
> >$ sudo pkcon update --only-download
> >Getting updates               [=========================]
> >Finished                      [=========================]
> >No packages require updating to newer versions.
> >
> >$ sudo dnf update
> >No read/execute access in current directory, moving to /
> >Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:28 ago on Thu Jun 16 09:30:07 2016.
> >Dependencies resolved.
> >=========================================================================
> ===========================================================
> > Package                                 Arch              Version
> Repository                Size
> >=========================================================================
> ===========================================================
> >Installing:
> > double-conversion                       x86_64            2.0.1-6.fc23
> local-fedora              44 k
> >Upgrading:
> > NetworkManager-l2tp                     x86_64            1.0.2-2.fc23
> local-updates             84 k
> > autocorr-en                             noarch            1:5.0.6.2-
> 7.fc23                          local-updates            204 k
> ><snip>
> >util-linux                              x86_64            2.28-2.fc23
> local-updates            2.2 M
> >
> >Transaction Summary
> >=========================================================================
> ===========================================================
> >Install   1 Package
> >Upgrade  59 Packages
> >
> >Total download size: 187 M
> >Is this ok [y/N]: n
> >Operation aborted.
> >
> >
> >Why would that be?
> 
> PackageKit and DNF use separate caches, which are not updated at the
> same time. Try "pkcon refresh" first to update its cache.


Ok, I tried that but it made no difference.  Does pkcon use /etc/yum.repos.d/?


--
John Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to