Dne 14.6.2016 v 21:06 Eric Griffith napsal(a): > > I'm testing it out for Phoronix. The copr works correctly, it installs > fine. Running snapper works fine, once you figure out what the correct > instructions should be (snapcraft.io <http://snapcraft.io>'s > instructions are slightly wrong). > > Applications appear to run correctly and integrate fine in the > Workstation environment.. minus LibreOffice. > > File sizes are massive compared to traditional packages. The Document > Foundation's rpm package for Linux x64 is 229 MBs. A LibreOffice 5.2 > Beta snap that I found clocked in at 1.1 GB. >
Eric, So how about similar article about Flatpack? I'd be interested to see the comparison between these two ... Vít > On Jun 14, 2016 14:26, "James Hogarth" <james.hoga...@gmail.com > <mailto:james.hoga...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > So I was rather surprised by this Softpaedia article today: > > > http://news.softpedia.com/news/snap-packages-become-the-universal-binary-format-for-all-gnu-linux-distributions-505241.shtml > > It claims that Canonical state that they have been working with > Fedora developers to make this the universal packaging format. > > The snapcraft.io <http://snapcraft.io> site instructions say to > use a COPR by a Canonical employee who is not a Fedora packager. > > Does anyone in marketing or development now what the article is > referring to and what's going on? > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
